Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the application of 10% sodium ascorbate (SA) after in-office bleaching on the penetration of hydrogen peroxide (HP) into the pulp chamber, color change, and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to the resin-enamel interface. Thirty premolars and thirty molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20 each). One group was exposed to deionized water (negative control). The other two groups were bleached with 35% HP in a single session for 3x15 minutes for each application. However, in only one of them, SA was applied for 10 minutes after bleaching. After, the concentration (µg/mL) of HP in each pulp chamber was evaluated by UV-Vis spectrophotometry. Color changes (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) were evaluated with a digital spectrophotometer before and in the first week after bleaching. After treatment, molars were restored and sectioned to obtain resin-enamel interface sticks for µTBS at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. The HP concentration and µTBS data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests, and color changes were analyzed by t-tests (α = 0.05). SA application significantly improved the µTBS values and reduced the HP concentrations within the pulp chambers (p < 0.0001). The application of SA significantly interfered with the color changes after bleaching when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Application of 10% SA after in-office bleaching successfully reduced the penetration of HP into the pulp chamber; however, it decreased color change.

Resumo Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os efeitos da aplicação do ascorbato de sódio a 10% (AS) depois do clareamento em consultório na penetração do peróxido do hidrogênio (PH) na câmara pulpar, mudança de cor e resistência de união (RU) da interface resina-esmalte. Trinta pré-molares e trinta molares foram divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos (n = 20). Um grupo foi exposto em água deionizada (controle negativo). Os outros dois grupos foram clareados com 35% PH numa única sessão de 3x15 minutos para cada aplicação. Porém, só um grupo recebeu AS durante 10 minutos depois do clareamento. Depois, a concentração (µg/mL) do PH no interior de cada câmara pulpar foi avaliado com espectrofotometria UV-Vis. A mudança de cor (ΔEab, ΔE00 and ΔWID) foi avaliada como espectrofotômetro digital antes e depois de uma semana do clareamento. Após de cada tratamento, os molares foram restaurados e seccionados em espécimes com interface resina-esmalte para o teste de RU por microtração a uma velocidade de 1 mm/min até a fratura. Os dados da concentração de PH e RU foram analisados usando ANOVA de uma via e teste de Tukey, e a mudança de cor com o teste t (α = 0.05). A aplicação de AS melhorou significativamente a RU e reduziu a concentração de PH na câmara pulpar (p < 0.0001). A aplicação de AS interferiu significativamente na mudança de cor depois do clareamento comprado com o grupo controle (p < 0.05). A aplicação de SA a 10% depois do clareamento em consultório reduziu significativamente a penetração do PH na câmara pulpar e interferiu na mudança de cor.

Abstract Despite the availability of in-office bleaching gels with a 6% concentration of hydrogen peroxide (HP), these gels have not been evaluated in younger patients. They are commercially available with a tip, associated or not with a brush, where the tip with a brush spreads the gel over the entire surface to have a smaller thickness (thin layer) since the manufacturers indicate the application of a thin layer of gel. Objective This randomized, split-mouth, double-blind clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of in-office bleaching with 6% HP in adolescents using different application tips, as well tooth sensitivity (TS) and aesthetic self-perception. Methodology Sixty participants were randomized for 6% HP self-mixing bleaching gel tip design: without brush and with brush. In-office bleaching was performed in 3 sessions of 50 minutes. Color change was evaluated using a digital spectrophotometer (ΔE ab , ΔE 00 , and ΔWI D ) and color guide (ΔSGU), the absolute risk and intensity of TS with a visual analogue scale and aesthetic self-perception with the oral aesthetic scale (a=0.05). Results The groups achieved similar bleaching regardless of the application tip (p>0.05). However, only for ΔWI D , a significant mean difference (MD) was observed in the third week (MD 2.3; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.3; p < 0.001) and at one month (MD 1.6; 95% CI 0.6 to 2.6; p < 0.03) favoring the tip without brush. Regarding TS, 45% in the tip-without-brush group and 33% in the tip-with-brush group reported TS (odds ratio 0.61; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.28; p<0.02), with low TS intensity (MD 0.05; 95% CI -0.06 to 0.17; p>0.36). All patients reported improved aesthetic self-perception after bleaching (MD -1.3; 95% -1.8 to -0.9; p<0.001). Conclusions Regardless of the tip used bleaching with 6% HP achieved a bleaching efficacy and improved the aesthetic self-perception. However, a lower risk of TS for application using the tip with brush was observed.

Resumo Este estudo teve como objetivo quantificar a permeabilidade do peróxido de hidrogênio (PH), avaliação da mudança de cor, morfologia da superfície e composição de elementos após a aplicação de agentes dessensibilizantes antes do clareamento em consultório. Cinquenta pré-molares foram seccionados, um tampão de acetato foi colocado na câmara pulpar e divididos em cinco grupos (n=10). No grupo controle positivo, apenas o gel clareador em consultório foi utilizado e no grupo controle negativo nenhum tratamento foi realizado. Foram aplicados três agentes dessensibilizantes diferentes: grupo KF2%®; grupo Mi Paste® e Desensibilize Nano-P®. O procedimento de clareamento foi realizado com PH a 35%. A absorbância da solução resultante foi determinada em um espectrofotômetro. A mudança de cor foi avaliada utilizando um espectrofotômetro digital. Quatro pré-molares adicionais foram atribuídos aos mesmos grupos acima para análise em microscópio eletrônico de varredura, bem como para avaliar a composição elementar com espectrometria de energia dispersiva por raios-X. Os dados foram submetidos ao teste ANOVA e Tukey (a=0,05). Todos os produtos reduziram a penetração de PH na câmara pulpar. Mi Paste e Nano P foram os produtos que apresentaram a menor penetração de PH, semelhante ao grupo controle negativo (p<0,001). Nenhuma diferença significativa foi detectada na mudança de cor (p<0,001). Em relação à morfologia do esmalte, os grupos analisados após o clareamento apresentou maior deposição de agentes dessensibilizantes na superfície. O uso de agentes dessensibilizantes antes do clareamento dental parece ser uma alternativa para reduzir os efeitos adversos no dente.

Abstract This study aimed to quantify the penetration of hydrogen peroxide, color change evaluation, surface morphology, and composition after application of desensitizing agents before in-office bleaching. Fifty premolars were sectioned, an acetate buffer was placed in the pulp chamber and divided into five groups (n=10). In the positive control group, only the in-office bleaching gel was used, and in the negative control group, no treatment was used. Three different desensitizing agents were applied: Desensibilize KF2%® group; Mi Paste® group, and Desensibilize Nano-P® group. The bleaching procedure was carried out with 35% HP. The absorbance of the resulting solution was determined in a spectrophotometer. Color change was assessed by using a digital spectrophotometer. Four additional premolars were assigned to the same groups above for analysis under scanning electron microscope, as well as to evaluate the elemental composition with X-ray dispersive energy spectrometry. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). All products reduced the penetration of HP in the pulp chamber. Mi Paste and Nano P were the products that yielded the lowest HP penetration, which was similar to the negative control group (p<0.001). No significant difference was detected in color change (p<0.001). Concerning enamel morphology, the groups that were analyzed after bleaching were observed a greater deposition of desensitizing agents on the surface. The use of desensitizing agents before tooth bleaching seems to be an alternative to reduce adverse effects of the tooth.

Abstract Objectives This randomized, split-mouth, single-blinded trial assessed whether the use of reservoirs in at-home bleaching trays is equivalent to non-reservoir trays. Our choice of an equivalence trial was based on the expectation that a non-reservoir tray is sufficient to produce a color change. Secondary outcomes such as tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI) were also assessed. Methodology Forty-six patients were selected with canines shade A2 or darker. In half of the patient’s arch, bleaching trays were made with reservoirs and the other half, without reservoirs. At-home bleaching was performed with carbamide peroxide (CP) 10% (3 h daily; 21 days). Color change was evaluated with a digital spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔE00, and Whiteness Index) and shade guide units (ΔSGU) at baseline, during and one-month post-bleaching. TS and GI were assessed with a numeric scale (NRS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Results After one month, the equivalence of reservoir and non-reservoir groups were observed in all color instruments (p>0.05). Fifteen and sixteen patients presented pain (absolute risk: 33% and 35%, 95%, confidence interval (CI) 21-46% and 23-49%) in the reservoir and non-reservoir side, respectively. The odds ratio for pain was 0.8 (95%CI 0.2-3.0) and the p-value was non-significant (p=1.0). TS intensity was similar between both groups in any of the pain scales (p>0.05). No difference in the GI was observed (p>0.05). Conclusions The protocol with reservoirs is equivalent in color change to the non-reservoir, although no superiority of the latter was observed in terms of reduced TS and GI with at-home 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching. Clinical Relevance The presence of reservoirs in a bleaching tray did not improve color change or affect tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation.